Faces of the coin that the Unga subsidy is.
With the government’s subsidy on maize flour in place, ugali sosa is set to make a comeback, much to the delight of many Kenyans. However, the move has elicited vociferous debate, on social media platforms with a section of Kenyans terming it to be a political move now that we are on the cusp of the general elections, while others query why the government couldn’t have intervened much earlier. The bottom line however is, if it happens that on your next visit to kwa Mathe the first ugali serving does nada to calm the pangs of hunger, you can afford to say “Mathe, leta sosa!” without batting an eye lid.
In the previous week’s post, I had opined that
instead of using price controls to check the rising costs of living, as a
section of Kenyan tweeps were earlier clamouring for, the government should
instead use subsidies to lower the prices of key food commodities. Considering
that ugali is a staple in the diets
of many Kenyans, the move to subsidise its retail prices is laudable. There’s a
caveat however nay, caveats.
One of the downsides of this subsidy is the fact that
it ignores equity. The subsidy saw the price of a packet of 2kg maize flour
drop to sh 100 up from sh 205. While this is a sigh of relief to Kenyans in
urban areas who buy packed maize flour, what happens to the rural poor (which
is the most vulnerable group) who buy maize and have it grinded to flour at a kisiagi? The connection here being the
fact that, the jump in the prices of unga
stems from a decrease in maize supply which has forced prices to go upwards. So,
while the price of packaged maize meal has gone down, the subsidy does not tilt
the price of a gorogoro of maize for
the rural poor.
The success of such a subsidy depends on effective
implementation by the government. How this subsidy business is supposed to go is;
the government gets millers to sign up for the subsidy programme - by end of
Wednesday, data from the Ministry of Agriculture showed that 70 millers had
signed up representing 80 per cent of millers- upon agreement on the prices, the
government deposits money for the subsidy programme into an escrow account.
Presently, according to Cabinet Secretary for Agriculture Peter Munya, the
government has already made an initial deposit of sh 8 billion. The amount
deposited into the escrow account is expected to cover the difference between
the subsidized selling prices and the market prices before the subsidy. The
mechanics of the fuel subsidy which has been in place since late last year work
much in the same way as that of the maize subsidy. However, a delay in payments
by the government to the stabilization fund in April this year saw major oil
marketers hoard their stocks leading to an acute shortage. This is a situation
that could befall the maize subsidy if the government is not keen to play its
role. Given that we are talking about food here, a staple in most consumer
households for that matter, one would hate to imagine the ramifications if
government reneges on its payment to the subsidy.
Comments
Post a Comment